🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an cute little “playful character”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a big but fiercely protective companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and moves like a worm. Lillooet is the “loving presence” with a kind nature.

A group of thirty captive marine mammals in a Canada-based amusement park have been entangled in a tussle between a shuttered park, government authorities and animal rights activists.

But those closest to the whales say the heated discussion over their destiny often overlooks the individual traits of the whales who, after living their entire lives in captivity, have been carefully observed by the caretakers who work with them regularly.

After the Canadian government disallowed the sale of the belugas to China, the embattled amusement park near Niagara Falls where they are held stated it would consider to end their lives unless the federal government funds the upkeep of keeping them alive. Canada’s fisheries minister has refused that request, placing the 30 whales in an increasingly precarious position.

Highly Cognitive Marine Mammals

Scientists say that beluga whales’ neuroanatomy, along with their mimicry abilities, cognitive challenges and group interactions suggest they are deeply intelligent animals – something a former trainer discovered personally.

Burgess spent a significant period as a marine mammal specialist, a job that required earning the trust of the sea creatures.

“Developing those connections over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of care. At the outset, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “In time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so magical and rewarding.”

Burgess knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nonetheless astounded by the subtleties and unique traits in their dispositions. She cultivated a particular love for Eve and Cleopatra with contrasting natures.

“One whale accepted me. Cleo made me earn it,” she said. “Both changed the way I understand bonding.”

Public Concerns and Facility Decline

Her connection with the whales evolved against a background of increasing societal concern to their captivity.

During her time at the attraction, seven belugas and the park’s one killer whale, the orca, passed away. In total, 19 belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a number which the facility attributes to expected lifespan, but which advocates say indicates the inadequate care in which they were kept.

The park did not operate to the guests over the summer, but Burgess says she observed directly results of the closure. “Structural materials is falling apart from the tanks because they’re in disrepair and not being repaired. The whales are inquisitive and so they pick it up and navigate with chunks in their jaws. It’s upsetting to see.”

The park did not reply to a inquiry, but in the past asserted: “The whales … obtain far better health care and around the clock supervision than any person in the United Kingdom, or other places.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was fired from the park in the spring following the passing of Eos, an ailing beluga the caretakers had to put down. She said the park suspected details of the death were disclosed to the media and she was released not long after.

The uncertainty over the whales’ future has left Burgess and other caretakers in anguish. She says the park’s threat to kill its whales is a leverage tool and is a “practically unfeasible” task, adding any plans to humanely kill even a individual beluga would require “significant personnel”, trucks and specialized tools.

“It cannot happen in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess backs requests for the whales to be transferred promptly from the park, with its failing enclosures and shrinking team.

In the autumn, Canada’s government official rejected a proposal to transfer the whales to an overseas location.

“Granting the request would have meant a ongoing life in captivity and a return to performance for audiences,” the minister stated. “As society, we know that belugas should be in the wild, not in enclosures for our entertainment. I could not in good conscience approve an export that would prolong the treatment these belugas have endured.”

But the former trainer said the minister’s comments reveal a wider lack of awareness of the realities of existence for belugas born in captivity.

“The people needs to understand these are whales that have existed solely in captivity and they will need constant supervision for the rest of their years,” she said. “Many just don’t comprehend that it’s not as simple as saying ‘end operations’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Continuing Discussion

As officials struggle to find a answer, ideas have surfaced, some of which have little basis in reality. An idea called for the belugas to be let go into the open waters of northern regions – where whales are a important part of food for local populations.

A proposed sanctuary in the province of eastern Canada, which has received regulatory clearance, has shown to be most controversial. The prospective site, which includes extensive space of protected cove, remains undeveloped. Supporters remain optimistic that it could in time represent a permanent answer for eight of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among caretakers she’s spoken with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “only an untested concept” in the whales’ fate.

Different voices say the idea of a refuge represents a changing attitudes away from captive facilities and could represent a feasible solution in the coming months.

Charles Vinick, leader of the initiative, said the location will replicate the cognitive activities and feeding regimen the whales get from trainers, albeit in a more expansive area. He said after the health of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|